16 September 2025

Is the United States moving nuclear weapons to the United Kingdom?

Preface

I wrote this in late September 2023, and updated it on 27 January 2024. The questioner likely was motivated by the Russia - Ukraine war. Um Russian Special Military Operation. Invasion of Ukraine by Russia? You get the idea.

Has the U.S. recently moved nuclear bombs to the UK?

No, the United States hasn’t moved nuclear weapons to the UK. Well, not yet and even if we eventually do, not for awhile. More on that in a moment. First, a bit about why it might not even be necessary.

The UK already has nuclear weapons

England developed nuclear bombs in 1953, and has been able to deliver them on submarines since 1969. That is to say, the UK already has nuclear weapons on its nuclear-powered submarines. According to the sometimes lefty or maybe just contrarian Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (the cheery people with the Doomsday Clock), 120 of the UK’s stockpile of 225 nuclear warheads are operationally available.

UK as nuclear monad?

No, I'm not referring to monads in Haskell, nor in APL!

The UK is the only “nuclear weapons state” which has a single nuclear platform: Four Vanguard-class nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs). To be precise, the SSBNs are the nuclear platform and the submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) are the nuclear delivery system.

The UK limits its SSBNs to carrying no more than 40 nuclear warheads at a time. Prior to 2010, each submarine carried 48 nuclear warheads. The reduction from 48 to 40 was probably a strategic decision rather than a tactical one, i.e. there is still room for the extra warheads.

The nuclear warheads are named Holbrook. All 120 have the same name. More on that in a moment too.

Only one of the four submarines is at sea at any time. Two stay in port, while a fourth undergoes routine maintenance and repairs. This is why it makes sense to have 120 operational warheads (SLBMs): 40 go with the one submarine at sea. 40 remain on each of the two submarines anchored at dock but ready to be deployed if needed. Since the fourth submarine is undergoing maintenance, it wouldn’t do to have nuclear warheads on board! So, 40 x 3 = 120

Nuclear triad

In contrast to the UK, the US has a nuclear triad. That means that the US can dispatch nuclear warheads in three different ways: by Polaris submarine, by airplane, and by land.

“Land” doesn’t mean putting a nuclear bomb on a flatbed truck and just driving it up to wherever needs to be bombed, shoving it over the side, then driving away and detonating remotely from a safe distance. Instead, nuclear-tipped ICBMs (intercontinental ballistic missiles) get the nukes where they are needed. ICBMs are launched from one continent, travel quite low, though always above ground, to hit a target on another continent. ICBMs can be conventional too, i.e.have non-nuclear bombs. There are a few genuine and many CGI videos of ICBMs in action (most are courtesy of defense contractors). All depictions are impressive.

ICBMs are distinctly different from nuclear bomb delivery by airplane. In the latter case, the planes are flown to the destination, then the nuclear missiles are dropped from a height and detonate slightly above their targets.

US nukes in the UK


people standing in green grass in UK holding signs
CNDUK No US Nukes Day of Action demonstrators

09 August 2025

What happens if a supercomputer is used to mine bitcoins?

This has happened. I wrote about incidents of supercomputers being used to mine cryptocurrency a few years ago: Subverting computing research for fool's gold.

Bitcoin

NSF sponsored-researcher misused supercomputers to mine bitcoin via BBC June 2014:

A researcher has been suspended from a US national agency for misusing supercomputers to mine bitcoins at two universities. In a report, the National Science Foundation (NSF) revealed that more than $8,000 worth of bitcoins had been generated from NSF-funded computers... It is claimed that the unnamed researcher used remote access software and may have been attempting to cover his tracks.

So, he knew it wrong, tried to hide what he did including remotely accessing the supercomputer from Europe, and got caught.


The researcher’s access to all NSF-funded supercomputer resources was terminated, and after the NSF Office of Inspector General investigated (pp. 30-31), he was suspended from any further activities government-wide.